This process can create a narrative that appears convincing while resting on very little direct evidence.
A more careful reading recognizes that the reported arrangement is one detail among many, and that it cannot bear the weight of an entire conclusion about the marriage.
The reported dinners, meanwhile, offer another detail to consider. If the couple did consistently eat together, that could indicate that they maintained at least one shared routine. But even that observation should not be stretched beyond what the source actually says.
A shared meal can be meaningful without proving everything. Separate bedrooms can be practical without disproving intimacy. And a public relationship can remain partly unknowable even after years of attention.
That is the tension at the heart of the story: the public wants a simple answer, while the available information supports a more complicated picture.
What the Household Staff Reportedly Noticed
The insiderās account did not stop with the dinners. The source also suggested that the atmosphere inside the household was noticeable to the people working there.